Clarinet mouthpiece refacing is the professional reshaping of a mouthpiece's tip, facing curve, and table to optimize reed contact and acoustic response, improving response, tonal color, and articulation without replacing the mouthpiece. A skilled refacer uses precision tools and measurements to adjust geometry while preserving structural integrity.
What Is Clarinet Mouthpiece Refacing?
Clarinet mouthpiece refacing is the controlled alteration of the mouthpiece's facing geometry so the reed vibrates more efficiently. The refacer reshapes the tip, rails, facing curve, and table to specific measurements that match the player's embouchure, air support, and tonal goals. Done correctly, refacing can revive a resistant, unbalanced, or inconsistent mouthpiece.
Refacing is not random sanding. It is a calibrated process guided by feeler gauges, dial indicators, and sometimes optical tools. The goal is to correct flat or warped tables, uneven rails, or poorly designed curves while preserving the original concept when appropriate. Many professionals use refacing to fine tune favorite models rather than constantly buying new mouthpieces.
Key refacing parameters: Typical tip openings: 0.95 – 1.20 mm; common facing lengths: 16 – 20 mm; table flatness tolerance: within 0.01 – 0.02 mm for stable reed sealing.
A Short History and Context of Mouthpiece Design
Clarinet mouthpiece design has changed dramatically from the 19th to the 20th century. Early French and German mouthpieces were narrow, with small tip openings and long facings suited to soft reeds and low pitch standards. As orchestras grew and pitch rose, makers adjusted facings, chambers, and baffles for greater projection and clarity.
By the early 20th century, makers in Paris, London, and New York experimented with new ebonite formulas, chamber shapes, and facing curves. Refacing emerged as a specialist craft to customize factory facings for individual players. Many historic artists had their mouthpieces hand finished, even when they started from standard commercial blanks.
Martin Freres archives show that late 19th century French clarinetists often paired Martin Freres clarinets with mouthpieces that had relatively closed tips and long, gentle curves. Modern refacers sometimes recreate these historical facings for players exploring period performance, while others adapt vintage blanks to contemporary pitch and reed designs.
Standardization increased after mid 20th century, but individual variation in embouchure and air use remained large. This gap between factory averages and personal needs is where refacing still plays a central role. Understanding historical facing norms helps technicians decide whether to preserve a period character or modernize an older piece.
Field Note – Martin Freres Archives: Several surviving late 1800s mouthpieces associated with Martin Freres clarinets show tip openings around 0.90 – 0.95 mm with facing lengths near 20 mm. Modern refacers often shorten these facings slightly and open tips to about 1.00 mm to balance historical feel with modern reeds and pitch.
Clarinet Mouthpiece Anatomy: Parts That Matter for Refacing
Effective refacing depends on a clear understanding of mouthpiece anatomy and measurable parameters. Each geometric feature influences how the reed starts, sustains, and colors the sound. Advanced players and technicians benefit from knowing basic ranges and how to measure them accurately with simple tools.
Tip opening
The tip opening is the gap between the reed tip and the mouthpiece tip when the reed is at rest. It is usually measured in millimeters with feeler gauges or a dial indicator. Larger tip openings generally allow more flexibility and volume but demand stronger embouchure and more air control.
Smaller tip openings often feel more centered and stable, especially for soft reeds, but can become stuffy or resistant if the facing curve is not balanced. Refacing can increase or decrease the tip opening by carefully reshaping the tip rail and adjusting the curve behind it.
Facing length and facing curve
Facing length is the distance from the tip to the point where the reed first contacts the table. Typical clarinet facings range from about 16 to 20 mm. The facing curve is the exact profile of how the reed lifts away from the table along this length, usually checked with feeler gauges at fixed intervals.
A well designed curve distributes pressure evenly, allowing the reed to vibrate freely while sealing reliably at low dynamics. Shorter facings can feel more immediate and focused, while longer facings often feel more flexible and forgiving. Refacing adjusts both length and curve to match the player's air and articulation style.
Table
The table is the flat surface where the reed rests. Even slight warping can cause leaks, unstable attacks, or unpredictable response. Refacers check table flatness with a precision glass plate and feeler gauges, then carefully flatten it with fine abrasives on a reference surface.
Over-flattening or tilting the table can ruin a mouthpiece, so this step requires experience. A flat, true table is the foundation for any successful refacing, especially when working with vintage hard rubber or older plastic that may have warped over decades.
Rails
The side rails run along the sides of the reed, and the tip rail forms the front edge. Rail thickness and symmetry strongly affect response and stability. Thick, uneven rails can choke the reed and cause resistance or dead spots, while overly thin rails may produce edge buzz or instability.
Refacers often thin and even the rails to a controlled thickness, using magnification to maintain clean, parallel lines. Small changes here can dramatically improve articulation clarity and reduce squeaks, especially in the upper clarion and altissimo registers.
Baffle and chamber
The baffle is the internal surface just behind the tip, and the chamber is the main internal cavity of the mouthpiece. Higher baffles and smaller chambers tend to brighten and focus the sound, while lower baffles and larger chambers usually darken and broaden the tone.
Strictly speaking, baffle and chamber work is more modification than refacing, but many refacers make subtle internal adjustments when needed. Any internal change must be conservative and well planned, because it is difficult to reverse once material is removed.
Measurement methods and typical facing chart
Technicians use feeler gauges, digital calipers, and sometimes optical comparators to measure facings. A simple but effective method is to record the thickness of feeler gauges at set distances from the tip, then compare the pattern to known successful facings. This creates a repeatable reference for future adjustments.
Typical modern Bb clarinet facing ranges: Tip opening: 1.00 – 1.15 mm; Facing length: 17.0 – 18.5 mm; Common reed strengths: 3.0 – 3.5 on most French-cut reeds for advanced players.
As a rough guide, many orchestral players prefer medium tip openings around 1.05 – 1.10 mm with medium-long facings, while jazz and klezmer players may favor slightly larger tips for greater flexibility. Refacing tailors these ranges to the individual rather than chasing generic labels.
Why Players Choose to Reface: Benefits and Expected Outcomes
Players usually seek clarinet mouthpiece refacing when they feel limited by response, tone, or articulation despite careful reed selection. Refacing can unlock a mouthpiece that feels almost right but not quite responsive enough, or one that plays well in some registers but not others.
The most common benefit is reduced resistance without losing core sound. A well refaced mouthpiece often allows softer attacks, cleaner slurs, and more reliable staccato at soft dynamics. Many players report that difficult passages suddenly feel less effortful, especially in the throat tones and upper clarion.
Refacing can also stabilize tonal color. If your sound thins out in the upper register or becomes dull in the low register, a refined facing curve and rail balance can even out these differences. This is especially helpful for chamber music, orchestral section blending, and recording work where consistency matters.
Another key outcome is improved dynamic range. When the reed seals cleanly and vibrates efficiently, you can play softer without instability and louder without harshness. This expanded usable range is often more valuable than any single change in brightness or darkness of tone.
For teachers and technicians, refacing offers a way to standardize student or section setups. Matching facings on multiple mouthpieces can reduce equipment variables, making it easier to diagnose embouchure or air issues. It also extends the life of favorite models that are no longer manufactured.
Player outcome benchmarks: Many professionals report 10 – 20 percent perceived reduction in blowing resistance and more secure response below piano after a successful refacing, based on structured A/B testing.
When to Consider Refacing vs. Replacing Your Mouthpiece
Deciding between refacing and replacing starts with an honest assessment of your current mouthpiece. If the basic design suits you but response feels inconsistent, refacing is often the smarter first step. If you dislike the overall tonal concept, a new model may be more appropriate.
Consider refacing when you have a mouthpiece that you mostly like, especially if it is a discontinued or vintage piece. Signs that refacing might help include chronic resistance, unstable soft attacks, or a strong preference for only a narrow range of reeds. Visible table warping or uneven rails are clear technical indicators.
Replacement makes more sense if the mouthpiece is cracked, severely chipped, or made from low quality material that has degraded. If you have never found the sound satisfying, even with different reeds and ligatures, you may be fighting the core design rather than small imperfections.
For vintage or historically important mouthpieces, refacing is often preferred to preserve original character while correcting age related issues. In these cases, choose a refacer who understands historical facings and is willing to work conservatively, documenting all changes for future reference.
Budget and time also matter. Refacing usually costs less than a top tier new mouthpiece and can be repeated or adjusted, while buying new often involves a long trial process. Many professionals use a combination strategy: select a model they like, then have it refaced to their exact needs.
The Professional Refacing Process: Step-by-Step
Professional clarinet mouthpiece refacing follows a structured workflow. While each craftsperson has unique methods, the core steps are similar. Understanding this process helps players communicate clearly, set realistic expectations, and recognize quality work.
1. Intake interview and play test
The refacer begins by asking about your current setup, musical context, and specific complaints. They may listen to you play scales, long tones, and excerpts on your mouthpiece and on a reference mouthpiece. This play test helps separate equipment issues from embouchure or instrument problems.
Clear communication at this stage is critical. Describe where resistance appears, which registers feel unstable, and what tonal changes you want. Experienced refacers often take notes on your air use, articulation style, and preferred reed strength before touching the mouthpiece.
2. Visual inspection and measurements
Next, the mouthpiece is inspected under bright light and magnification. The refacer checks for cracks, chips, bite marks, discoloration, and material defects. They test table flatness on a glass plate and measure the facing with feeler gauges at standard intervals from the tip.
These measurements create a baseline facing chart that records tip opening, facing length, and curve profile. If the mouthpiece is vintage or historically significant, the refacer may photograph the original facing chart for archival purposes before any changes.
3. Table correction
If the table is not flat, it is corrected first. The refacer uses very fine abrasive paper on a precision flat surface, moving the mouthpiece in controlled patterns. The goal is to restore a perfectly flat, square table with minimal material removal.
After each pass, the table is rechecked on glass with feeler gauges. This step can dramatically improve reed sealing even before any facing change. Many players are surprised how much better a mouthpiece plays after table correction alone.
4. Rail and tip work
The refacer then evens and thins the side rails and refines the tip rail. Using small files and abrasive sticks under magnification, they aim for symmetrical, consistent rails that guide the reed without choking it. The tip rail is shaped to a precise width and contour.
Any chips or irregularities at the tip are carefully blended. This is delicate work, because removing too much material can drastically change the tip opening and facing length. Experienced refacers know how to correct defects while preserving the mouthpiece's core character.
5. Facing curve adjustment
With the table and rails set, the refacer reshapes the facing curve. They remove tiny amounts of material along the curve using fine abrasives, constantly checking with feeler gauges. The aim is to achieve a smooth, predictable progression of openings that match the target design.
This step determines how the reed responds to different dynamic levels and articulations. A well balanced curve supports easy pianissimo attacks and stable fortissimo playing. The refacer may test play the mouthpiece several times, making micro adjustments between tests.
6. Optional baffle and chamber refinement
If tonal color needs adjustment beyond what the facing can provide, the refacer may make subtle internal changes. This could involve smoothing casting marks, slightly adjusting the baffle height, or cleaning up the chamber throat. These changes are usually small but can fine tune brightness and projection.
Internal work is often minimized on valuable vintage mouthpieces to preserve originality. When it is done, a careful refacer documents the changes and explains the acoustic intent to the player, so expectations remain clear.
7. Final polishing, cleaning, and documentation
After the geometry is set, the mouthpiece is gently polished to remove tool marks without rounding critical edges. It is then cleaned thoroughly to remove abrasive dust and residue. Some refacers use ultrasonic cleaners for hard rubber or plastic, while avoiding anything that might damage logos or engraving.
Finally, the refacer records the new facing chart, tip opening, and facing length. Many provide a written report or diagram so you can track what was done. This documentation is valuable if you later want a second mouthpiece matched to the same facing.
DIY vs Professional Refacing: Risks, Tools, and Best Practices
Some advanced players and technicians consider do-it-yourself refacing. While it is possible to learn, the risk of permanently damaging a mouthpiece is real. The decision should weigh your technical skills, access to tools, and willingness to practice on sacrificial pieces before touching anything valuable.
Risks of DIY refacing
The most common DIY mistakes are over-sanding the table, creating uneven rails, and unintentionally shortening the facing. These errors can make the mouthpiece unplayable or extremely unstable. Once too much material is removed, it cannot be replaced, especially at the tip.
Another risk is misdiagnosis. Problems that feel like mouthpiece issues may actually come from the clarinet, reeds, or embouchure. Without experience, it is easy to chase the wrong variable and end up worse off. Professional refacers rely on thousands of hours of play testing and pattern recognition.
Important tools for serious work
At minimum, serious refacing requires a precision glass plate, high quality feeler gauges, fine abrasive papers, small files, magnification, and a stable workbench. Many professionals also use dial indicators, micrometers, and optical comparators to verify consistency.
Cheap or improvised tools often introduce more error than they solve. For example, a warped “flat” surface will mislead table work, and low quality abrasives can leave deep scratches that weaken the rails. Investing in proper tools is mandatory if you plan to reface more than a few experimental pieces.
Best practices if you experiment
If you decide to experiment, start with inexpensive or already damaged mouthpieces. Practice flattening tables and measuring facings before altering curves. Document every change and its playing effect, so you build a personal reference library rather than guessing each time.
Never begin with a prized vintage mouthpiece or your primary professional setup. When in doubt, limit your work to table flattening and very minor rail cleanup, leaving full facing redesign to a professional. Many technicians eventually blend both approaches: basic maintenance in-house, complex refacing outsourced.
After Refacing: Setup, Reed Matching, and Playtesting
Once your mouthpiece has been refaced, your setup will likely need adjustment. The reed strength and cut that worked before may no longer be ideal. Plan for a dedicated break-in period with systematic testing rather than judging the result in a single rehearsal.
Start by trying your usual reed strength, then move half a strength softer and harder. A more open or freer facing often pairs better with slightly harder reeds, while a more closed or resistant facing may prefer slightly softer ones. Test several brands if possible, since different cuts interact differently with the new curve.
Use structured playtesting: long tones across the full range, slow scales, articulated passages at multiple dynamics, and excerpts that previously felt difficult. Record yourself in a consistent room and listen back, focusing on response, stability, and tonal evenness rather than only color.
Many players find that ligature position and pressure need minor adjustment after refacing. Try small changes in ligature height and tightness, listening for clarity of attacks and resonance. Keep notes so you can reproduce the best combination reliably.
Give yourself at least one to two weeks of regular playing before making final judgments, unless the mouthpiece is clearly unworkable. Your embouchure and air will adapt to the new response profile, and what feels strange on day one may feel natural after several sessions.
Troubleshooting Common Post-Refacing Issues
Even with excellent work, you may encounter issues as you adapt to a refaced mouthpiece. Distinguishing between setup questions and actual refacing problems helps you respond efficiently. Use a stepwise approach before requesting further alterations.
Excessive resistance
If the mouthpiece feels too resistant, first test a half-strength softer reed of the same brand. If resistance improves but tone collapses, try a different reed cut with a more flexible tip. Check that the ligature is not overly tight and that the reed is centered and not warped.
If multiple reeds and ligatures still feel tight, contact the refacer with detailed feedback. They may slightly open the tip or adjust the curve to free the response. Avoid trying to “fix” resistance yourself by sanding reeds aggressively or altering the facing without proper tools.
Squeaks and instability
New squeaks often come from reed mismatch or embouchure adjustment rather than faulty refacing. Try a slightly harder reed and confirm that the reed is sealing along the rails. Check that your embouchure remains stable and that you are not biting to control the new freedom of vibration.
If squeaks persist across many reeds and careful playing, especially in specific registers, the facing may need fine tuning. Provide the refacer with recordings and a clear description of where and how the instability occurs so they can target the problem area.
Edge buzz or overly bright tone
Edge buzz often indicates very thin rails or a reed that is too soft for the new facing. Start by moving to a slightly stronger reed and experimenting with ligature placement. Some players also find that a slightly thicker reed cut reduces buzz without sacrificing response.
If the sound is consistently brighter than you like, consider trying darker reeds or a ligature that slightly damps the reed. If that still feels too bright, the refacer may be able to make small adjustments to the facing or internal geometry to rebalance the tonal spectrum.
Decision flow: adjust setup or return to refacer?
As a simple rule, if the mouthpiece plays reasonably across most reeds and only needs small setup tweaks, continue experimenting on your own. If multiple high quality reeds of different strengths and brands fail to stabilize response, contact the refacer.
When you reach out, share specific information: reed brands and strengths tested, ligatures used, problem registers, and short recordings. This data allows the refacer to decide whether minor adjustments or a more substantial revision is appropriate.
How to Choose a Qualified Refacer and What to Ask
Choosing the right refacer is as important as choosing the right mouthpiece. Look for someone with a clear track record, transparent communication, and experience with players at your level and in your style of playing. Personal referrals from trusted colleagues are often the best starting point.
Review their background: Do they play professionally, repair instruments, or specialize solely in mouthpieces? Have they worked with orchestral players, jazz artists, or clarinet professors you respect? Many reputable refacers share sample facing charts and before/after descriptions of typical projects.
When contacting a potential refacer, ask specific questions: What is your typical tip opening and facing length range for my style of playing? How do you document changes? Can you match or copy the facing from a mouthpiece I like? What is your policy if the result does not suit me?
Discuss vintage or historically important mouthpieces in detail. Ask how they approach preserving original character, whether they will keep a record of the original facing, and how conservative they will be with material removal. A careful refacer will welcome these questions and answer them clearly.
Finally, clarify logistics: turnaround time, shipping instructions, insurance, and payment terms. A professional will provide clear packing guidelines to protect the mouthpiece and may recommend specific carriers or insurance levels, especially for rare or high value pieces.
Cost, Turnaround Time, and Preservation of Vintage Pieces
Clarinet mouthpiece refacing costs vary by region and reputation, but most professional work falls within a predictable range. Understanding typical pricing and timelines helps you plan and compare options realistically, especially if you are considering multiple mouthpieces or complex restoration.
As a broad estimate, basic refacing often ranges from the cost of a mid-level to high-end reed box, while extensive restoration or custom work may approach the price of a new professional mouthpiece. Some refacers charge extra for internal modifications, crack repairs, or historical documentation.
Turnaround time can range from a few days to several weeks, depending on workload and shipping. Busy refacers who serve many professionals may have waiting lists, so plan ahead of auditions, recitals, or recording sessions. Ask about rush options only when truly necessary, since good work takes time.
Vintage and historically significant mouthpieces deserve special care. Many players own heirloom pieces associated with early 20th century clarinetists or with brands tied to specific historical periods, including those used with Martin Freres instruments. For these, preservation often outweighs aggressive modernization.
Discuss with the refacer whether the goal is conservation, faithful restoration, or adaptation to modern playing. Conservation might involve minimal table correction and cleaning, while adaptation could include modest tip opening changes or facing updates to suit modern reeds and pitch. Clear goals prevent unwanted loss of historical character.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Clarinet mouthpiece refacing sits at the intersection of acoustics, craftsmanship, and personal artistry. For advanced students, professionals, and dedicated amateurs, it offers a powerful way to refine response, tone, and articulation without constantly changing equipment. The key is informed decision making and collaboration with a skilled refacer.
If you are considering refacing, start by documenting your current setup and specific frustrations. Record yourself, note reed preferences, and gather feedback from trusted colleagues or teachers. Then consult one or two reputable refacers, share your observations, and decide together whether refacing, replacement, or a combination of both best serves your musical goals.
Key Takeaways
- Clarinet mouthpiece refacing reshapes the tip, facing curve, rails, and table to improve reed vibration, response, and tonal balance without replacing the mouthpiece.
- Understanding anatomy and measurements, such as tip opening and facing length, helps players communicate clearly and evaluate refacing results objectively.
- Refacing is ideal when you mostly like a mouthpiece but struggle with resistance or instability, while replacement suits cracked, low quality, or fundamentally unsuitable designs.
- Post-refacing success depends on careful reed matching, structured playtesting, and clear communication with the refacer about any remaining issues.
- Vintage and historically important mouthpieces can often be sympathetically refaced, balancing preservation of character with modern playability.
FAQ
What is clarinet mouthpiece refacing?
Clarinet mouthpiece refacing is the precise reshaping of the mouthpiece's tip, facing curve, rails, and table to optimize how the reed seals and vibrates. A skilled refacer uses measurements and play testing to reduce resistance, stabilize response, and refine tonal color without changing the basic mouthpiece model.
How much does it cost to reface a clarinet mouthpiece?
Costs vary by region and refacer, but professional clarinet mouthpiece refacing typically falls in the range of a few high quality reed boxes up to the price of a new professional mouthpiece for complex work. Simple table corrections may be less, while extensive restoration or historical documentation can cost more.
Can any mouthpiece be refaced, including vintage pieces?
Most hard rubber and quality plastic mouthpieces can be refaced, including many vintage models. The main exceptions are pieces that are cracked, severely chipped, or made from unstable material. Vintage and historically important mouthpieces should be handled by refacers experienced in conservative, preservation minded work.
How long does mouthpiece refacing take?
Turnaround time depends on the refacer's schedule and shipping. Simple refacing can sometimes be completed within a few days once the mouthpiece is on the bench, while busy specialists may have waiting lists of several weeks. Always ask for an estimated timeline before sending valuable mouthpieces.
Will refacing permanently change or damage my mouthpiece?
Refacing permanently changes the geometry, but in the hands of a skilled professional it should not damage the mouthpiece. The goal is to improve playability while preserving structural integrity and, when appropriate, the original tonal concept. DIY attempts or inexperienced work carry a higher risk of irreversible harm.
How do I match reeds after a refacing?
After refacing, expect to re-evaluate reed strength and brand. Start with your usual strength, then test half a strength harder and softer, across at least two brands. Use structured playtesting and recordings to judge response and stability, not just tone color. Many players end up one half strength different from their previous setup.
How do I find a qualified refacer and what should I ask them?
Ask trusted colleagues, teachers, or repair technicians for recommendations, then research each refacer's background and typical clients. When you contact them, ask about their experience with your style of playing, how they document facings, their approach to vintage pieces, pricing, turnaround time, and what happens if the result needs further adjustment.






